Debate Evidence Exchange Results
I am providing a sample of the evidence that I have submitted to the evidence exchange to all debaters. Want to get all of the evidence in that is submitted? Joint the Evidence Exchange!! Want to sample the evidence, then check out the below listed links:
)
Most Americans Don't Trust Bush On Foreign Policy
Berke, June 21, 2001
Far from giving him a political lift, Bush's European tour, though it drew largely upbeat news coverage, did not appear to help him in the eyes of the public. More than half of the respondents say they are uneasy about Bush's ability to tackle an international crisis, and more people than not say he is not respected by other world leaders.
[Richard
Berke-Staff Writer, San Francisco Chronicle, Bush slips in U.S. poll despite
trip
Most
doubt his foreign policy skills, June 21, 2001, p. A1]
) Most Americans Don't Trust Bush On Policy Issues
Berke, June 21, 2001
The
poll also found that a majority of Americans seem disenchanted by what they view
as Bush's inattention to matters they care most about. And there is a
substantial gap between his and their stands on many of those issues, including
the patients' bill of rights, education, the energy crisis, the environment,
raising the minimum wage, prescription drugs and judicial appointments.
[Richard
Berke-Staff Writer, San Francisco Chronicle, Bush slips in U.S. poll despite
trip
Most
doubt his foreign policy skills, June 21, 2001, p. A1]
) Republicans Are Questioning Bush's Leadership
Berke, June 21, 2001
The president's difficulties may have tarnished how people perceive Republicans. Forty-six percent of the respondents hold a favorable view of the party, which is similar to the party's standing in the wake of the contentious impeachment hearings; three months ago, 54 percent viewed the Republican Party favorably.
[Richard
Berke-Staff Writer, San Francisco Chronicle, Bush slips in U.S. poll despite
trip
Most
doubt his foreign policy skills, June 21, 2001, p. A1]
)
Bush Losing Support On Many Issues
Berke, June 21, 2001
On
a host of issues, Americans' views are closer to those espoused by Democrats
than by those of Bush and other Republicans. Three-quarters of the respondents
want Medicare to include provisions for prescription drugs, even if that means
an increase in premiums for Medicare patients. Nearly two-thirds said the
program should be available to all Medicare recipients, not just those with low
incomes.
[Richard
Berke-Staff Writer, San Francisco Chronicle, Bush slips in U.S. poll despite
trip
Most
doubt his foreign policy skills, June 21, 2001, p. A1]
) Republican Leadership Questioning Bush's Foreign Policy Ability
MacIntyre, June 22, 2001
A SENIOR Republican leader has made a stinging attack on President Bush’s diplomacy with Russia as opinion polls show that support for him has fallen amid doubts over his ability to handle foreign affairs. Jesse Helms, the hardline conservative senator who headed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee until two weeks ago, said that Mr Bush’s recent praise of President Putin of Russia was an “excessively personal endorsement”.
[Ben
MacIntyre-Staff Writer, The Times, Bush Scorned as Putin’s Dupe, June 22,2001]
)
Bush Is Losing Support
MacIntyre,
June 22, 2001
As
the first cracks appear in his Republican support, Mr Bush is facing opinion
polls showing that the honeymoon period accorded to new presidents is
emphatically over. A poll for The New York Times yesterday found that, far from
getting a boost from his European tour and the passage of large tax cuts, his
approval rating has dropped to its lowest level since April last year when he
tangled with Senator John McCain in the early Republican primaries.
[Ben
MacIntyre-Staff Writer, The Times, Bush Scorned as Putin’s Dupe, June 22,2001]
)
Bush's Numbers Are Uncharacteristically Low
MacIntyre, June 22, 2001
The survey found that a majority believe Mr Bush is not respected by other world leaders and more than half also doubt his ability to tackle an international crisis. Mr Bush’s job approval rating of 53 per cent is comparable to that of Bill Clinton at the same point in his presidency. Mr Clinton, however, had suffered a string of legislative failures in his first months in office, whereas Mr Bush has arrived at the same point after a comparatively easy ride.
[Ben
MacIntyre-Staff Writer, The Times, Bush Scorned as Putin’s Dupe, June 22,2001]
) Most People Don't Think Bush Can Handle An International Crisis
MacIntyre, June 22, 2001
But
perhaps the most worrying poll number for Mr Bush is the 52 per cent who believe
he does not have the ability to “deal wisely” with an international crisis,
compared with 42 per cent who think he does.
[Ben
MacIntyre-Staff Writer, The Times, Bush Scorned as Putin’s Dupe, June 22,2001]
)
Republican Leadership Losing Faith In Bush
MacIntyre,
June 22, 2001
The
sharp criticism from Mr Helms is the first time that a senior Republican has
publicly taken issue with the President, but the outburst from the Carolina
senator reflects mounting frustration among conservatives at what they perceive
to be a too deferential approach to Russia and China. Mr Helms said that Mr
Putin supplies “rogue states” with weapons and that Moscow has stamped the
“jackboot of repression” on Russian media, a sharp contrast to Mr Bush’s
depiction of the Russian leader as an “honest, straightforward leader”.
[Ben
MacIntyre-Staff Writer, The Times, Bush Scorned as Putin’s Dupe, June 22,2001]
)
Putin Threats To MIRV Missiles In Response To NMD
CNN.com,
June 27, 2001
The
Russian military announced it had test-fired a huge Stiletto missile from its
space base at Baikonur, Kazakhstan. Missile
tests are mounted routinely in Russia, but Wednesday's came a week after
President Vladimir Putin threatened a nuclear expansion if President George W.
Bush's plans for a missile defence shield, NMD, went ahead.
[CNN.com,
Russia's missile hint to Bush, June 27, 2001]
)
NMD Can't Counter MIRVed Missiles
CNN.com,
June 27, 2001
Putin repeated at the weekend his threat to put multiple warheads on existing missiles to counter U.S. moves to abandon the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. He said the U.S. would not be able to counter multiple warheads for decades.
[CNN.com,
Russia's missile hint to Bush, June 27, 2001]
)
NMD Moots Start II And Causes Russian Prolif
CNN.com,
June 27, 2001
The
Stiletto, or SS-19, was built between the mid-1970s and 80s, and can carry six
warheads, each with a force of one to two megatons. At one stage Russia deployed 360 of the 80ft giants, and the
Stilettos were regarded as the backbone of Russia's nuclear arsenal.
But under the START II treaty Moscow can keep only 105 -- and each must
be downgraded to just one warhead. Putin
said last week that START II -- signed by President Bush's father in 1993 --
would be automatically void if Washington pulled out of the ABM treaty to build
NMD.
[CNN.com,
Russia's missile hint to Bush, June 27, 2001]
)
Russian Missiles Will Beat ABM Treaty
CNN.com,
June 27, 2001
Itar-Tass
news agency said a military source had told it Russia's older, larger missiles
would be "the only way of resolving strategic tasks in contemporary
conditions." "Compared to
the Topol-M, the Stiletto has a considerably higher chance of overcoming the ABM
system of the likely enemy," due to its larger payload, it quoted the
source as saying.
[CNN.com,
Russia's missile hint to Bush, June 27, 2001]
)
Russian Prolif Is The Cheapest Response To US NMD
CNN.com,
June 27, 2001
Putin told reporters after a meeting with Austrian President Thomas Klestil on Saturday that world stability had been preserved "thanks to the balance of powers and interests" in the nuclear sphere. This means that all countries, including Russia, will have the right to install multiple warheads carrying nuclear weapons on their missiles," he said. For Russia, he said, installing multiple nuclear warheads on existing missiles "is the cheapest response."
[CNN.com,
Russia's missile hint to Bush, June 27, 2001]
)
US NMD Not Meant To Stop Russian Nukes
CNN.com, June 27, 2001
American officials have said the aim of a missile defence system would be to protect against possible attacks by unpredictable nations such as North Korea, Iran and Iraq, not former U.S. Cold War foe Russia.
[CNN.com, Russia's missile hint to Bush, June 27, 2001]
)
Bush Not Acting Decisively In Middle East
Novek,
June 27, 2001
Ending a state visit to France marked by sporadic protests, Syrian President Bashar Assad said Wednesday that the Bush administration has so far not acted strongly to defend peace in the Middle East.
[Jocelyn
Novek-Staff Writer, Associated Press, Assad: Bush 'not acting strongly' in
Mideast, June 27, 2001]
)
Middle East On Brink Of War
Novek, June 27, 2001
The
35-year-old leader also accused Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of
"pushing the region toward war," adding that Syria and Arab nations
were exercising restraint.
[Jocelyn
Novek-Staff Writer, Associated Press, Assad: Bush 'not acting strongly' in
Mideast, June 27, 2001]
)
US Must Play Role In Middle East Peace
Novek, June 27, 2001
He
added that "an American presence is necessary" in the peace process,
but that Europe also had an important role to play.
[Jocelyn
Novek-Staff Writer, Associated Press, Assad: Bush 'not acting strongly' in
Mideast, June 27, 2001]
)
US NMD Deployment Leads To Destabilizing Arms Race
Woolsey,
June 26, 2001
In
his recent marathon press conference, Russian President Vladimir Putin tried to
show both a velvet glove -- nobody here but us free enterprise democrats, folks
-- and a barely concealed mailed fist: In essence, if you Americans deploy
ballistic missile defenses we will put multiple warheads on our new ICBMs.
Some European and American observers have already declared that Putin has now
trumped every card in the American hand. What could be worse, they ask, than
more Russian strategic warheads? Destabilizing! Arms race!
[James Woolsey - The writer, an attorney and a former CIA director, was ambassador, delegate or adviser in five U.S.-Soviet arms control negotiations,Putin's Futile Warhead-Rattling, Washington Post, June 26, 2001]
)
Russian Prolif Is Meaningless
Woolsey,
June 26, 2001
If
Putin wants to waste his rubles convincing the world that his nostalgia for the
Cold War knows no bounds, it's his problem, not ours. The number of Russian
strategic warheads was a central concern for us only in the historical context
of the Cold War and the threat the Soviets then posed to Europe. Fixation on
such numbers today is a demonstration of short-term memory loss -- about
everything that's happened since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Today we have two
serious problems with Russia's nuclear forces, but neither has anything to do
with the number of their strategic warheads.
[James
Woolsey - The writer, an attorney and a former CIA director, was ambassador,
delegate or adviser in five U.S.-Soviet arms control negotiations, Putin's
Futile Warhead-Rattling, Washington Post, June 26, 2001]
)
Russian Nuclear Warning System Does Not Work Properly
Woolsey,
June 26, 2001
First,
Russian warning systems are thoroughly decrepit and riddled with gaps. Some of
their radars are not even in Russia, due to the breakup of the Soviet Union, and
the satellites in their warning network are starting to fail. In 1995 President
Boris Yeltsin was falsely alerted because the wheezing Russian warning system
mistakenly took the launch of a Norwegian scientific rocket (of which they had
been notified) for a possible missile launch from a U.S. submarine. The Russians
need help filling these gaps in their warning systems, and two years ago we
agreed to do so -- by forming a joint U.S.-Russian warning center in Moscow that
would use data from both countries -- but the Russians continue to delay its
implementation.
[James
Woolsey - The writer, an attorney and a former CIA director, was ambassador,
delegate or adviser in five U.S.-Soviet arms control negotiations,Putin's Futile
Warhead-Rattling, Washington Post, June 26, 2001]
)
Russian Nuclear Stockpiles Not Well Guarded
Woolsey,
June 26, 2001
Second, although Russian strategic warheads are well-guarded, large numbers of small tactical nuclear warheads and huge amounts of fissionable material usable for bombs are not, and these create a serious stockpile security problem. Nunn-Lugar funds from the United States have helped secure about two-thirds of this mess from theft and smuggling and could help secure the rest, but again Russian stalling (much of it from President Putin's old outfit, the domestic successor to the KGB) is holding up progress.
[James
Woolsey - The writer, an attorney and a former CIA director, was ambassador,
delegate or adviser in five U.S.-Soviet arms control negotiations, Putin's
Futile Warhead-Rattling, Washington Post, June 26, 2001]
)
Russian Prolif Is A Lesser Concern Than Current Problems
Woolsey, June 26, 2001
The
numbers of Russian strategic warheads don't cause, or even exacerbate, either
the warning or the stockpile problems. The warning gaps have to be fixed whether
the Russians have 1,000 strategic warheads or 5,000 -- the accidental launch of
even one would be an incredible disaster -- and this risk is basically
unaffected by warhead numbers. The stockpile security problem is also
independent of strategic warhead numbers. It is fissionable material and small
tactical warheads that are in danger of being stolen or sold, not the
well-guarded strategic systems.
[James
Woolsey - The writer, an attorney and a former CIA director, was ambassador,
delegate or adviser in five U.S.-Soviet arms control negotiations,Putin's Futile
Warhead-Rattling, Washington Post, June 26, 2001]
)
NMD Defends Against Russian Nukes
Woolsey, June 26, 2001
It
is reported that President Bush may soon show he is not obsessed by strategic
warhead numbers by unilaterally reducing ours. We should also keep trying to get
the Russians to let us help them solve their real strategic problems -- decrepit
warning and unsecured stockpiles. And if part of the administration's defense
plan against rogue states includes boost phase intercept -- being able to shoot
down offensive missiles very early in their flight -- the system would
incidentally also defend Russia.
[James
Woolsey - The writer, an attorney and a former CIA director, was ambassador,
delegate or adviser in five U.S.-Soviet arms control negotiations,Putin's Futile
Warhead-Rattling, Washington Post, June 26, 2001]
) Russian MIRV Capability Not Make Missiles More Dangerous
Woolsey, June 26, 2001
Today's world bears not the faintest resemblance to that of the Cold War. Brussels indeed stands naked to invaders, but it is to a golden horde of antitrust lobbyists. Some of our allies doubt our resolve, but their concern is our fetish for CO2-emitting SUVs. Missiles are still the heart of our nuclear deterrent, but the bulk of them are on Trident submarines; added numbers of strategic warheads, by anyone, do not make them vulnerable.
[James Woolsey - The writer, an attorney and a former CIA director, was ambassador, delegate or adviser in five U.S.-Soviet arms control negotiations,Putin's Futile Warhead-Rattling, Washington Post, June 26, 2001]
Home | Disads | C-Plans | Critiques | Topicality | Links | News
Discussion Board | Chat Room | Evidence Exchange